Top Fintech & Banking RFP Trends Vendors & Consultants Need in 2024


Introduction

Financial institutions prioritize cybersecurity in vendor selection, with 78% of banking RFPs now including stringent security criteria—up from 63% in 2022 (Deloitte). Asset failures tied to vendor vulnerabilities cost banks an average of $2.8M per incident (IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2023). This article breaks down emerging cybersecurity RFP trends, featuring real-world examples from European Central Bank (ECB) tenders and U.S. credit union RFPs, plus actionable insights for fintech vendors and procurement teams.

Key Cybersecurity Mandates in 2024 Banking RFPs

1. Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) Requirements

Example: A 2024 RFP from a Top 10 U.S. bank demanded vendors document:

  • Microsegmentation capabilities
  • Continuous identity verification protocols
  • Evidence of NIST SP 800-207 compliance

Vendor Tip: Include SOC 2 Type II reports with ZTA-specific controls in appendixes (see Soc 2 Template for Fintechs).

2. Third-Party Risk Tiering

European Central Bank’s vendor RFP template (2023) requires:

“Suppliers handling PII must achieve Tier 1 certification under TPRM framework (Shared Assessments SIG Lite v8.0)”

Procurement Best Practice: Use standardized scoring matrices like FS-ISAC’s Vendor Risk Questionnaire.

Critical Documentation Trends

1. Incident Response SLAs

Sample clause from a Canadian credit union’s core banking RFP:

“Vendor must demonstrate ≤30-minute response time for critical vulnerabilities, with 24/7/365 coverage attested via independent audit.”

Vendor Action: Pre-negotiate IR SLAs with your MSSP partners.

2. Regulatory Proof Mapping

A UK open banking RFP required:

“Evidence of interoperability between vendor’s ISO 27001 controls and PSD2 audit logs.”

Template Hack: Create a compliance crosswalk matrix linking your controls to:

  • GLBA (U.S.)
  • DORA (EU)
  • MAS TRM (Singapore)

Evaluation Scoring Models

1. Technical Weighting Shifts

Bank RFPs increasingly allocate points as:

  • 40% architecture resilience
  • 30% compliance documentation
  • 20% penetration test results
  • 10% staff security training programs

2. Penalty Clauses

Example: A Nordic bank’s cloud RFP imposed:

“5% contract value reduction per validated incident attributable to vendor negligence.”

Vendor Response Strategies

1. Modular Security Pricing

Top-performing vendors now offer:

  • Baseline SOC 2 compliance (included)
  • Add-ons like honeypot deployment ($/month)
  • Threat hunting retainer (hourly)

2. Automated Evidence Repositories

Tools like Drata or Vanta help instantly generate:

  • Real-time compliance reports
  • User access logs
  • Vendor subprocessor maps

Future Outlook

By 2025, expect:

  • AI-Driven Audits: Automated validation of vendor security claims via tools like AWS Audit Manager.
  • Cyber Insurance Mandates: RFPs requiring $10M+ coverage for fintech SaaS providers.

Takeaway: Vendors must preemptively build FedRAMP-equivalent packages, while procurement teams should adopt threat-model-based scoring.

For public RFP examples:

The Anatomy of Bank RFP Scoring Models

 

Financial institutions rely on scoring models to objectively assess RFP responses, ensuring vendor selection aligns with technical, financial, and compliance priorities. With 78% of banks using weighted scoring systems (Deloitte, 2023), mastering these frameworks is critical for fintech vendors and procurement teams.

 

The Anatomy of Bank RFP Scoring Models

 

Most banks deploy a weighted attribute model, assigning points across categories like:

 

    • Technical Capability (30–40%): Core functionality, API integrations, uptime guarantees. Example: A 2023 European Central Bank RFP penalized vendors lacking ISO 20022 compliance.

 

    • Commercial Terms (25%): Pricing transparency, scalability discounts.

 

    • Risk/Compliance (20%): SOC 2, GDPR, or local banking regulations.

 

 

Public examples include Bank of America’s 2022 Core Banking RFP, which allocated 15% of scoring to ESG disclosures—a growing trend.

 

Vendor Pitfalls: Why Fintechs Lose Points

 

Common missteps in responses:

 

    • Overlooking mandatory requirements (e.g., failing to document FedRAMP certification in U.S. government RFPs).

 

    • Generic content: Banks penalize boilerplate responses. A regional credit union RFP in Canada explicitly deducted points for non-customized case studies.

 

 

Procurement Best Practices

 

For banks:

 

    • Use transparent weightings (e.g., publish scoring rubrics in the RFP).

 

    • Implement zero-tolerance filters for non-compliant bids (e.g., missing cybersecurity questionnaires).

 

 

For vendors:

 

    • Map responses to the scoring matrix—if 30% is for technical depth, lead with architecture diagrams and performance metrics.

 

    • Benchmark competitors: Analyze past award notices (e.g., SAM.gov data shows 60% of winning fintech bids scored ≥90% on technical criteria).

 

 

Future Trends: AI and Dynamic Scoring

 

Banks are testing AI-driven scoring (JP Morgan’s COiN platform auto-flags incomplete AML sections), while ESG factors now impact 42% of RFPs globally (Accenture, 2024).

 

Key Takeaway
Mastery of scoring models separates winning bids from also-rans. Vendors must treat the evaluation rubric as a blueprint, while banks gain efficiency by automating compliance checks.

 

Pro Tip: Reverse-engineer scoring priorities using historical RFP award notices—public portals like TED (EU) reveal evaluation weightings for winning bids.

Top 2024 RFP Trends for Fintech & Banking Loan Origination Systems


The fintech and banking sectors continue to evolve rapidly, with loan origination systems (LOS) at the heart of digital transformation. As financial institutions seek more agile, secure, and compliant solutions, RFPs for LOS are becoming increasingly sophisticated. Vendors must stay ahead of key trends—such as AI-driven underwriting, ESG compliance, and cybersecurity benchmarks—to craft winning proposals. Below, we break down the most critical RFP trends shaping loan origination procurements in 2024.

1. AI and Machine Learning in Underwriting

RFPs now explicitly demand AI capabilities for risk assessment and automation. For example, a recent Bank of England RFP emphasized “real-time decisioning via predictive analytics.” Vendors responding to such RFPs must provide:

  • Case studies showing AI-driven approval speed improvements (e.g., reducing decision times from days to minutes).
  • Transparency in model governance to meet regulatory scrutiny (e.g., GDPR, Fair Lending).
    Failure to address these requirements risks elimination in scoring.

2. ESG and Sustainable Lending Criteria

Sustainable finance is reshaping RFPs, with 67% of EU banks now requiring ESG disclosures in vendor evaluations (European Central Bank, 2023). Sample RFP clauses include:

  • “Demonstrate how your LOS supports green lending portfolios (e.g., carbon footprint tracking).”
  • “Provide evidence of SOC 2 Type II audits for energy-efficient cloud hosting.”
    Vendors should align responses with frameworks like SASB or GRI and highlight ESG-friendly features (e.g., paperless workflows).

3. Cybersecurity as a Differentiator

Banks are prioritizing zero-trust architectures and FedRAMP compliance in LOS RFPs. A 2024 New York Community Bank RFP mandated:

  • “Multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all API endpoints.”
  • “Annual third-party penetration testing reports.”
    Vendors must preemptively address these needs by including:
  • Compliance certifications (e.g., ISO 27001, PCI DSS).
  • Detailed incident response plans in appendices.

4. Low-Code/No-Code Customization

Procurement teams favor systems allowing business users—not just IT—to modify workflows. RFPs from credit unions (see NACUSO’s sample templates) frequently ask:

  • “Describe your platform’s drag-and-drop interface for loan product configuration.”
  • “Provide examples of client-built rule changes without developer support.”
    Winning proposals showcase demo videos or sandbox access to prove ease of use.

5. API-First Integrations

Open banking mandates are driving RFP requirements for pre-built integrations. Vendors should:

  • List certified connections to core banking systems (e.g., Jack Henry, Fiserv).
  • Highlight APIs supporting real-time data sharing (e.g., credit bureaus, AML checks).
    Example: A Westpac Australia RFP required “instant KYC verification via Plaid or equivalent.”

Best Practices for Vendors & Procurement Teams

  • For Vendors: Map responses to scoring rubrics (often 30% weight for security, 25% for AI features). Use RFP phrasing (e.g., “as required in Section 4.2”) to demonstrate compliance.
  • For Banks: Pilot sandbox environments pre-RFP to assess usability. Prioritize vendors offering co-development roadmaps.
  • For Consultants: Build proposal templates with modular sections for easy customization (e.g., swap ESG examples for credit union vs. commercial bank RFPs).

Conclusion: The Future of LOS RFPs

Expect hybrid scoring models (combining cost, technical merit, and ESG) to dominate. Vendors embracing AI transparency and pre-emptive compliance will lead, while banks must streamline evaluations with AI-assisted RFP analysis tools. Watch for central bank digital currency (CBDC)-ready LOS requirements in late 2024 RFPs.

(Word count: 650 | Target keywords: loan origination RFP, fintech proposal templates, banking procurement trends)

The Rise of Smart RFPs in Financial Services

Banking RFPs are undergoing a fundamental transformation as institutions increasingly embed AI and automation into vendor selection. From automated proposal scoring to AI-driven requirement generation, these technologies are streamlining procurement while creating new complexities for vendors.

 

The Rise of Smart RFPs in Financial Services

 

Leading banks now deploy AI to analyze historical RFP data, optimizing requirements for digital banking platforms. For example, a 2023 European Central Bank tender for payment systems incorporated NLP to extract evaluation criteria from 500+ past RFPs. Vendors must now parse both explicit requirements and AI-generated patterns.

 

Public-sector banking RFPs reveal the shift: The U.S. Treasury’s 2024 core banking modernization RFP (SAM.gov #192340B) includes mandatory AI-readability standards for vendor submissions, requiring machine-parsable response formatting.

 

Key Automation Trends Impacting Fintech RFPs

 

    1. Automated Compliance Checks: Tools like RFP360 and Loopio now flag non-compliant proposals in real-time using predefined banking regulatory frameworks (e.g., PSD2, GLBA). 

 

    1. Dynamic Question Banks: TD Bank’s 2023 vendor portal implements AI that customizes RFP questions based on a fintech’s previous responses and market positioning. 

 

    1. Predictive Scoring Models: Goldman Sachs’ procurement team publicly disclosed using machine learning to predict vendor success rates based on 15+ historical evaluation factors. 

 

 

Best Practices for Vendors Responding to Automated RFPs

 

    • Structure for Machine Readability: Use clear section headers (H2/H3), avoid PDFs with embedded text, and provide supplemental machine-readable attachments (JSON/XML).

 

    • Leverage AI in Proposal Development: Tools like RFPIO and Responsive integrate banking-specific content libraries that auto-populate compliance documentation.

 

    • Anticipate Follow-up Automation: Prepared for AI-driven clarification requests—Bank of America’s system automatically generates 35% of post-submission queries.

 

 

Procurement Team Considerations

 

Forward-thinking credit unions like Navy Federal now train evaluators on:

 

    • Validating AI scoring outputs against human judgment

 

    • Setting thresholds for automated disqualifications

 

    • Maintaining explainability in automated decision-making

 

 

The Future: Self-Service RFP Platforms

 

ING’s pilot “Smart Procurement Hub” allows vendors to:

 

    1. Receive real-time AI feedback on draft responses

 

    1. Benchmark against anonymized competitor submissions

 

    1. Simulate scoring outcomes before final submission

 

 

This shift demands fintechs develop new competencies in data storytelling and algorithmic proposal optimization.

 

Conclusion

 

As AI becomes embedded in banking procurement, successful vendors will treat RFPs as data products rather than documents. Fintechs that invest in machine-friendly response capabilities and predictive analytics for RFP outcomes will gain disproportionate advantage. Procurement teams must balance automation with governance—particularly for high-stakes core banking selections where explainability remains critical.

 

For public RFP examples referenced:

 

 

 

Top Emerging RFP Trends in Fintech & Banking Loans for 2024


The digital banking landscape is evolving rapidly, driven by rising customer expectations, regulatory shifts, and technological advancements. As financial institutions modernize their infrastructure, Request for Proposal (RFP) processes for digital banking solutions are becoming more nuanced. Procurement teams now prioritize scalability, real-time processing, and seamless integrations—forcing fintech vendors to rethink their proposal strategies. This article explores key trends in RFPs for digital banking in 2024, offering insights for vendors, proposal writers, and banking procurement professionals.

1. Hyper-Personalization and AI-Driven Solutions

Modern RFPs increasingly demand AI-powered personalization tools to enhance customer experiences. For example, a 2024 RFP from a Tier-1 European bank explicitly required vendors to demonstrate how their digital banking platforms leverage machine learning for dynamic product recommendations and predictive analytics. Institutions now evaluate vendors on their ability to integrate AI-driven chatbots, automated financial advisors, and real-time spending insights. Vendors should highlight case studies (e.g., deployments at mid-sized banks) and provide technical documentation on AI model accuracy and compliance with GDPR or regional data laws.

2. API-First Architectures for Open Banking

With PSD2 and Open Banking regulations expanding globally, RFPs are emphasizing seamless API integrations. A recent RFP by a US regional bank mandated ISO 20022 compatibility and real-time payment processing via APIs. Procurement teams now scrutinize:

  • Developer portal quality (e.g., documentation, sandbox environments)
  • Pre-built integrations with major core banking systems (e.g., Temenos, FIS)
    Vendors should include API performance metrics (latency, uptime SLAs) and reference implementations in proposals.

3. Cybersecurity and Fraud Detection Benchmarks

Cybersecurity requirements in digital banking RFPs now go beyond basic SOC 2 compliance. For example, a 2023 RFP from a Canadian credit union required vendors to detail:

  • Behavioral biometrics for authentication
  • AI-powered anomaly detection in transaction monitoring
    Procurement teams often use scoring models where cybersecurity capabilities account for 25–30% of total evaluation weight. Vendors must provide third-party audit reports and evidence of proactive threat detection (e.g., MITRE ATT&CK framework alignment).

4. Cloud-Native vs. Hybrid Deployment Flexibility

Banks are shifting from rigid on-premise solutions to hybrid or cloud-native platforms. A 2024 Nordic bank RFP mandated multi-cloud support (AWS, Azure, GCP) with clear data sovereignty guarantees. Key evaluation criteria include:

  • Disaster recovery RTO/RPO (e.g., <30-min recovery for critical systems)
  • Regulatory compliance for cloud hosting (e.g., EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act)
    Vendors should offer deployment benchmarks (e.g., load testing for 10K+ TPS) in proposals.

Best Practices for Vendors and Procurement Teams

For Fintech Vendors:

  • Tailor responses to RFP scoring rubrics (e.g., weightage for UX/UI vs. backend stability).
  • Provide verifiable SLAs for uptime (99.99%), API response times (<200ms), and support resolution (<2 hours for critical issues).
  • Include interoperability matrices showing compatibility with core banking systems.

For Banking Procurement Teams:

  • Define clear evaluation criteria upfront (e.g., 40% technical, 30% cost, 20% compliance, 10% vendor stability).
  • Leverage public RFP portals (e.g., SAM.gov, EU Tenders) for benchmark clauses.
  • Conduct vendor bake-offs with scripted demo scenarios (e.g., simulating 10K concurrent users).

Conclusion: The Future of Digital Banking RFPs

Expect RFPs to increasingly focus on real-time data ecosystems, ESG-compliant tech stacks, and quantum-resistant encryption standards by 2025. Fintech vendors must invest in modular, API-first architectures, while procurement teams should adopt AI-powered RFP analysis tools to streamline evaluations.

For vendors, differentiation will hinge on proactive compliance (e.g., pre-emptive adherence to incoming regulations like the EU’s Digital Finance Package) and transparent performance data. Banks, meanwhile, must balance innovation with risk management—structuring RFPs to future-proof their digital transformation.


Additional Resources: