Emerging Trends in Know Your Customer Requirements for Fintech and Banking Sector RFPs

Kael TheoWritten by
Published on

Introduction

Cybersecurity has become a cornerstone of banking and fintech RFPs, driven by rising cyber threats and stringent regulatory demands. Financial institutions now prioritize robust security measures when selecting vendors, making cybersecurity requirements a critical evaluation factor. This shift reflects global incidents like the 2023 ICBC ransomware attack, which underscored the financial and reputational risks of inadequate protections. For fintech vendors, understanding these RFP expectations is key to competitive positioning.

Rising Regulatory and Risk-Driven Requirements

Modern banking RFPs increasingly reference frameworks like NIST CSF, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS. For example, a 2024 RFP by a top-10 U.S. bank mandated:

“Vendors must demonstrate SOC 2 Type II compliance and provide independent penetration testing results for all customer-facing applications.”
Central banks are also tightening standards; the ECB’s Cyber Resilience Oversight Expectations explicitly requires third-party vendors to align with its threat-monitoring protocols. Procurement teams now scrutinize:

  • Incident response timelines (e.g., sub-4-hour breach containment SLAs)

  • Data encryption standards (AES-256 or post-quantum cryptography)

  • Supply chain vetting (mapping subvendor risks via tools like HECVAT)

Examples from Public RFPs

  1. Singapore’s MAS: A 2024 cloud services RFP required vendors to disclose “geo-specific data residency controls” and “real-time DDoS mitigation metrics.”

  2. Canadian Credit Unions: A MERX-listed RFP scored vendors 20% on “proven anti-phishing implementations (e.g., FIDO2 MFA).”

  3. EU Digital Wallet Project: mandated “eIDAS-compliant identity proofing” for all biometric solutions (EU Tenders reference 2023/S 123-456789).

Best Practices for Vendors Responding to RFPs

  • Pre-RFP Preparation: Maintain an up-to-date security assurance package (SOC reports, SIG Lite, CAIQ).

  • Tailored Responses: Map controls explicitly to the RFP’s referenced frameworks (e.g., “Our API gateway meets FFIEC CAT ‘Encrypted Data Transit’ criteria”).

  • Proof Points: Include breach simulation results (e.g., MITRE ATT&CK coverage) and third-party audit summaries.

Procurement Team Recommendations

  • Evaluation Metrics: Scorecards should weight cybersecurity at ≥25% (see BankInfosecurity’s 2024 RFP Guidelines).

  • Red-Teaming: Require vendors to participate in controlled attack simulations.

  • Continuous Monitoring: Contractually mandate annual re-certifications and threat-intelligence sharing.

Future Trends

  1. AI-Driven Threat Detection: RFPs will demand explainable AI for anomaly detection (e.g., “Describe ML model training datasets for fraud algorithms”).

  2. Quantum Readiness: Expect 2025+ requirements for crypto-agility roadmaps.

  3. Regulatory Convergence: GDPR-style cyber rules will expand globally, with RFPs reflecting cross-border compliance demands.

Conclusion

For fintechs, aligning cybersecurity RFP responses with evolving threats and regulations is now a revenue imperative. Banking procurement teams must balance rigor with vendor feasibility—overly prescriptive requirements may stifle innovation. Those who treat cybersecurity as a collaborative differentiator, not just a compliance checkbox, will lead the next wave of fintech partnerships.

Additional Resources

FintechRFPs.com offers a curated library of professionally written RFP and RFI templates tailored for the fintech, banking, and payments industries. Whether you’re preparing responses for compliance, API integrations, cybersecurity, or core banking solutions, our templates help you save time, reduce errors, and improve your win rate with procurement teams and institutional buyers.

Respond Smarter and Faster with FintechRFPs.com Templates

Take the next step: explore our growing collection of fintech-specific RFP templates and boost your bid quality—visit FintechRFPs.com today.