Introduction

 

Cybersecurity has become a cornerstone of banking RFPs, driven by escalating threats and stringent regulatory demands. Financial institutions now prioritize robust security frameworks when selecting fintech vendors, with 78% of banks citing cybersecurity as a top-three evaluation criterion (Deloitte, 2023). This shift reflects incidents like the 2023 ransomware attack on a major European bank, which exposed vulnerabilities in third-party vendor integrations.

 

Key Cybersecurity Requirements in Modern Banking RFPs

 

Recent RFPs from institutions like JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank reveal standardized security demands:

 

1. 1. Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA):

       

      • • Example: A 2024 RFP by a U.S. regional bank mandated vendors demonstrate ZTA implementation via micro-segmentation and continuous authentication.

       

      • • Template Clause: “Vendors must provide evidence of least-privilege access controls and identity verification protocols.”

       

       

 

1. 1. SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 Certification:

       

      • • Over 60% of RFPs now require these certifications, up from 42% in 2020 (Gartner). The Reserve Bank of India’s 2023 guidelines explicitly list ISO 27001 as mandatory for core banking vendors.

       

       

 

1. 1. Incident Response SLAs:

       

      • • RFPs increasingly specify response times (e.g., “98% of critical vulnerabilities patched within 72 hours”), as seen in a Bank of America cloud-services RFP.

       

       

 

 

Real-World RFP Excerpts

 

• • European Central Bank (2024) required vendors to disclose penetration testing results for APIs used in open banking integrations.

 

• • Canada’s TD Bank included a “red team exercise” clause in its digital wallet RFP, requiring vendors to simulate advanced persistent threats (APTs).

 

 

Best Practices for Vendors

 

1. 1. Preemptive Documentation:

       

      • • Maintain an up-to-date security compliance matrix (see template from NIST) aligning with FIDO2, PCI-DSS, and regional standards like GDPR.

       

       

 

1. 1. Scenario-Based Responses:

       

      • • Instead of generic claims, use case studies: “Reduced attack surface by 40% for a Tier 1 bank through AI-driven anomaly detection (Client: Mizuho Bank).”

       

       

 

 

Advice for Procurement Teams

 

• • Leverage Scoring Models: Assign 25–30% weight to cybersecurity in evaluation matrices. Example:
    markdown
    | Criteria | Weight |
    |———————–|——–|
    | Compliance Certifications | 20% |
    | Incident Response Plan | 15% |
    | Encryption Standards | 10% |

     

 

• • Demand Transparency: Require vendors to disclose past breaches and remediation steps, as mandated in a 2023 Wells Fargo blockchain RFP.

     

 

 

Future Trends

 

1. 1. AI-Powered Audits: Expect RFPs to require vendors to integrate AI tools for real-time threat monitoring, akin to HSBC’s 2024 pilot.

 

1. 1. Third-Party Risk Scoring: Platforms like SecurityScorecard may become RFP prerequisites.

 

 

Conclusion

 

Cybersecurity in banking RFPs is evolving from checkbox compliance to dynamic, evidence-based evaluations. Vendors must adopt proactive security storytelling, while procurement teams should standardize assessments using frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK. The next frontier? RFPs mandating quantifiable cyber-resilience metrics, such as mean time to recovery (MTTR) benchmarks.

 

Resources:

 

• • U.S. Bank RFP Portal

 

• • EU Tenders for Financial Services

 

FintechRFPs.com offers a curated library of professionally written RFP and RFI templates tailored for the fintech, banking, and payments industries. Whether you’re preparing responses for compliance, API integrations, cybersecurity, or core banking solutions, our templates help you save time, reduce errors, and improve your win rate with procurement teams and institutional buyers.

Respond Smarter and Faster with FintechRFPs.com Templates

Take the next step: explore our growing collection of fintech-specific RFP templates and boost your bid quality—visit FintechRFPs.com today.

 

Introduction

 

Financial institutions are prioritizing cybersecurity like never before, with 78% of banking RFPs now including stringent vendor security requirements (Delotte, 2023). From encryption standards to incident response SLAs, procurement teams demand granular proof of compliance. For fintech vendors, understanding these evolving RFP requirements is critical to crafting competitive proposals while avoiding costly disqualifications.

 

The Rising Bar for Cybersecurity in RFPs

 

Modern banking RFPs—like the Bank of England’s 2023 Cloud Services RFP—now require:

 

• • SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 certification (mandatory in 92% of U.S. banking RFPs per Gartner)

 

• • Penetration testing reports with remediation evidence

 

• • Data sovereignty guarantees, especially for cross-border payments processors

 

• • Third-party audit rights for continuous monitoring

 

 

For example, a recent EU Open Banking RFP mandated vendors disclose all subprocessors and demonstrate GDPR-aligned breach notification workflows.

 

Common Pitfalls in Vendor Responses

 

Analysis of failed fintech RFP submissions reveals recurring issues:

 

• • Over-reliance on generic compliance language without bank-specific controls (e.g., stating “PCI DSS compliant” without evidence of quarterly ASV scans)

 

• • Missing incident response timelines – RFPs like TD Bank’s 2024 Fraud Solution RFP require sub-4-hour breach notification SLAs

 

• • Inadequate employee training documentation – 67% of procurement teams now request cybersecurity training logs (ACAMS survey)

 

 

Best Practices for Fintech Proposal Teams

 

1. Align with Financial Industry Frameworks

 

• • Map controls to FFIEC CAT, NIST CSF, or CIS Critical Security Controls

 

• • Reference recent financial sector audits (e.g., “Our SOC 2 report includes FedRAMP Moderate-equivalent controls”)

 

 

2. Provide Attack-Specific Protections

 

• • Detail defenses against APP fraud, supply chain attacks, and AI-driven social engineering

 

• • Highlight behavioral biometrics or transaction anomaly detection if applicable

 

 

3. Offer Procurement Teams Ready Compliance Packages

 

• • Pre-build FedRAMP/FINMA-ready documentation sets

 

• • Include executive summaries of third-party audit reports with redacted samples

 

 

Evaluation Criteria Used by Banks

 

Leading institutions like JPMorgan Chase use weighted scoring models where cybersecurity accounts for 30–40% of total points. Key evaluation dimensions:
| Criteria | Weight | Vendor Must Demonstrate |
|———-|——–|————————-|
| Data Encryption | 20% | AES-256 + TLS 1.3 implementation |
| Access Controls | 15% | Role-based RBAC with MFA |
| Incident History | 10% | ≤2 severity 3+ incidents in 24 months |

 

Regulatory Shapes Procurement Requirements

 

Upcoming SEC cybersecurity disclosure rules and EU DORA will force banks to:

 

• • Demand vendors’ CYBER maturity assessments

 

• • Require proof of cyber insurance ($5M+ coverage becoming standard)

 

• • Standardize critical vendor termination clauses

 

 

Future Trends for Fintech Vendors

 

1. 1. AI-Powered Compliance Checks: Some banks now use tools like RFPIO to automatically flag vendors missing key security controls.

 

1. 1. Continuous Attestation: Replace annual audits with real-time security posture dashboards.

 

1. 1. Quantum-Readiness: RFPs from institutions like ING now ask vendors to outline PQCs migration plans.

 

 

Conclusion

 

Winning banking RFPs requires moving beyond checkbox compliance. Vendors must contextualize security controls for financial workloads, while procurement teams should benchmark requirements against Basel Committee and FS-ISAC guidelines. As threat landscapes evolve, expect cybersecurity RFP sections to grow from today’s average 12 pages to 20+ by 2025.

 

Resources:

 

• • Bank of Israel’s RFP Security Requirements Template

 

• • FDIC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool

 

• • EU Tender Portal for Financial Services RFPs

 

FintechRFPs.com offers a curated library of professionally written RFP and RFI templates tailored for the fintech, banking, and payments industries. Whether you’re preparing responses for compliance, API integrations, cybersecurity, or core banking solutions, our templates help you save time, reduce errors, and improve your win rate with procurement teams and institutional buyers.

Respond Smarter and Faster with FintechRFPs.com Templates

Take the next step: explore our growing collection of fintech-specific RFP templates and boost your bid quality—visit FintechRFPs.com today.

 

Introduction

 

Core banking RFPs represent one of the most critical procurement processes for financial institutions, shaping their operational efficiency, compliance, and customer experience for years. With digital transformation accelerating, banks and credit unions must carefully evaluate vendors against evolving technical, regulatory, and strategic needs. This article examines common requirements in core banking RFPs, key evaluation criteria used by procurement teams, and actionable insights for vendors crafting competitive proposals.

 

Common Requirements in Core Banking RFPs

 

1. Functional Capabilities

 

Most RFPs mandate core functionalities such as:

 

• • Account Management (savings, checking, loans)

 

• • Transaction Processing (real-time posting, batch processing)

 

• • Compliance & Reporting (AML, KYC, Basel III)

 

• • Integration APIs (open banking, third-party fintech partnerships)

 

 

Example: A 2023 RFP by a mid-sized U.S. credit union (Sample Credit Union RFP) emphasized “seamless integration with digital banking platforms” as a non-negotiable requirement.

 

2. Regulatory and Security Standards

 

Cybersecurity and data protection are top priorities. Common stipulations include:

 

• • SOC 2 Type II compliance

 

• • GDPR/CCPA readiness

 

• • Multi-factor authentication (MFA) and encryption protocols

 

 

3. Scalability and Cloud Readiness

 

Many institutions now prioritize cloud-native solutions. A European bank’s RFP (EU Tenders Portal) required vendors to demonstrate “auto-scaling capabilities for peak transaction volumes.”

 

Evaluation Criteria Used by Banks

 

Procurement teams typically score proposals using weighted models, such as:

 

 

Criteria	Weight (%)
Functional Fit	30
Total Cost of Ownership	25
Vendor Stability	20
Implementation Timeline	15
Customer References	10

 

Case Study: A regional bank in Canada (MERX RFP) allocated 40% weight to “future-proofing” (e.g., modular architecture, API extensibility).

 

Best Practices for Vendors

 

1. Align with the Institution’s Strategic Goals

 

• • Highlight how your solution supports digital transformation or ESG initiatives (e.g., carbon footprint reduction in cloud hosting).

 

 

2. Provide Clear Differentiators

 

• • Example: A vendor won a bid by showcasing AI-driven anomaly detection in transaction processing, reducing fraud risks.

 

 

3. Anticipate Procurement Team Pain Points

 

• • Address common objections upfront (e.g., data migration challenges, legacy system decommissioning).

 

 

Advice for Procurement Teams

 

• • Standardize Scoring Early: Use a predefined rubric to avoid bias.

 

• • Request Proof of Concepts (POCs): Shortlist vendors who demonstrate live use cases.

 

• • Engage Stakeholders: Include IT, compliance, and customer experience teams in evaluations.

 

 

Future Trends

 

1. 1. AI-Powered Evaluations: Banks may automate scoring using NLP to analyze proposal quality.

 

1. 1. Modular RFPs: Institutions could unbundle core banking components (e.g., payments vs. lending).

 

 

Conclusion

 

Winning core banking RFPs requires vendors to balance technical depth with strategic alignment, while procurement teams must refine evaluation frameworks for agility. As fintech partnerships grow, RFPs will increasingly prioritize interoperability and innovation—making proactive preparation essential for both sides.

 

Actionable Takeaways:

 

• • Vendors: Invest in case studies showcasing successful migrations.

 

• • Banks: Pilot smaller-scale integrations before full deployment.

 

• • Consultants: Develop RFP templates that include ESG and cybersecurity appendices.

 

 

For public RFP examples, explore SAM.gov (U.S.) or TED (EU).

FintechRFPs.com offers a curated library of professionally written RFP and RFI templates tailored for the fintech, banking, and payments industries. Whether you’re preparing responses for compliance, API integrations, cybersecurity, or core banking solutions, our templates help you save time, reduce errors, and improve your win rate with procurement teams and institutional buyers.

Respond Smarter and Faster with FintechRFPs.com Templates

Take the next step: explore our growing collection of fintech-specific RFP templates and boost your bid quality—visit FintechRFPs.com today.

 

The ability to craft compelling, high-scoring RFP responses is a critical skill for fintech vendors competing in a crowded market. Financial institutions—from global banks to credit unions—rely on rigorous procurement processes to evaluate vendors, making proposal quality a decisive factor in winning deals. Poorly structured responses, vague differentiators, or misaligned content can disqualify even technically superior solutions. This article dissects proven strategies for fintech proposal writing, drawing from real-world RFPs and evaluation frameworks.

 

Why Proposal Writing Matters in Fintech Procurement

 

Fintech RFPs often hinge on granular scoring models where technical compliance (e.g., SOC 2 certification), pricing transparency, and implementation timelines carry predefined weightings. For example, Bank of Montreal’s 2023 Digital Transformation RFP allocated 30% of scoring to “vendor expertise and case studies,” penalizing generic responses lacking quantifiable results. Similarly, the National Australia Bank’s Open Banking Platform RFP required vendors to map their solution features to specific regulatory standards (e.g., UK Open Banking, CDR in Australia). Proposal writers must decode these implicit priorities early—ignoring them risks automatic point deductions.

 

Key Components of High-Scoring Fintech Proposals

 

1. 1. Executive Summary with Differentiators: Leading proposals open with a impactful summary linking the vendor’s unique strengths (e.g., proprietary AI fraud detection) to the issuer’s pain points (e.g., reducing false positives in AML checks). European Investment Bank’s Cybersecurity Solutions RFP (2024) awarded higher scores to vendors that quantified differentiators like “reduced mean time to detection (MTTD) by 40% in peer implementations.”

 

1. 1. Structured Compliance Matrices: Procurement teams use compliance matrices to accelerate evaluations. Vendors should mirror the RFP’s numbering system and label responses as “Fully Compliant (FC),” “Partially Compliant (PC),” or “Not Applicable (NA)”—a tactic used successfully in DBS Bank’s Cloud Core Banking Procurement.

 

1. 1. Client-Specific Case Studies: Generic case studies waste space. Instead, reference implementations for institutions of similar size, regulatory jurisdiction, or tech stack. For instance, a vendor responding to a credit union RFP might highlight a deployment for a US-based community credit union with under $500M in assets.

 

 

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

 

• • Overloading Technical Jargon: RFPs like the Reserve Bank of India’s CBDC Pilot Proposal explicitly penalized responses that failed to explain complex terms (e.g., “quantum-resistant cryptography”) in business contexts.

 

• • Ignoring Formatting Rules: JP Morgan’s 2023 Payments Modernization RFP automatically rejected proposals exceeding page limits or using unapproved fonts.

 

• • Underestimating Commercial Terms: Banks assess total cost of ownership (TCO), including onboarding and exit costs. Vendors should provide tiered pricing models, as seen in Santander’s SaaS Procurement Template.

 

 

Actionable Strategies for Vendors and Procurement Teams

 

For Vendors:

 

• • Use AI tools like RFPIO or Loopio to track recurring questions and benchmark past winning responses.

 

• • Partner with legal teams to pre-draft boilerplate sections (e.g., data sovereignty commitments) for faster turnaround.

 

 

For Procurement Teams:

 

• • Publish scoring rubrics upfront (as Citigroup did in its AI Vendor Evaluation RFP) to reduce subjective biases.

 

• • Require vendors to submit implementation roadmaps with milestones tied to penalties/rewards.

 

 

The Future of Fintech Proposal Writing

 

As AI automates compliance checks (e.g., confirming SOC 2 reports match RFP requirements), human effort will shift toward storytelling and strategic positioning. Expect more RFPs to demand Interactive Proposal Portals (IPPs), where vendors dynamically demonstrate APIs or fraud detection algorithms—a trend pioneered by the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s RegTech Sandbox RFPs.

 

For fintechs, mastering proposal writing isn’t just about ticking boxes—it’s about framing innovation as a low-risk, high-reward decision for risk-averse financial institutions. Those who align responses with quantifiable outcomes and procurement workflows will dominate shortlists.

 

Additional Resources:

 

• • Bank RFP Samples

 

• • EU Fintech Procurement Portal

 

• • US Treasury Vendor Guides

 

FintechRFPs.com offers a curated library of professionally written RFP and RFI templates tailored for the fintech, banking, and payments industries. Whether you’re preparing responses for compliance, API integrations, cybersecurity, or core banking solutions, our templates help you save time, reduce errors, and improve your win rate with procurement teams and institutional buyers.

Respond Smarter and Faster with FintechRFPs.com Templates

Take the next step: explore our growing collection of fintech-specific RFP templates and boost your bid quality—visit FintechRFPs.com today.

 

Introduction

 

Core banking modernization remains a top priority for financial institutions in 2024, with 78% of banks prioritizing platform upgrades (Gartner 2024). RFPs for these mission-critical projects demand meticulous vendor scrutiny, balancing technical resilience with digital transformation goals. This guide dissects common RFP requirements, evaluation frameworks, and pitfalls in procurement processes—drawing from recent public RFPs by Lloyds Bank, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, and the National Bank of Egypt.

 

Critical Requirements in Modern Core Banking RFPs

 

1. Cloud-Native Architecture

 

2024 RFPs overwhelmingly mandate cloud-ready solutions, as seen in the Bank of Ireland’s 2023 Core Banking RFP, which required:

 

 

“Multi-cloud deployment capacity with active-active geo-redundancy and PCI-DSS compliant container orchestration”

 

 

Vendors must demonstrate:

 

• • Hybrid cloud deployment models (AWS/Azure/GCP)

 

• • Zero-downtime patching capabilities

 

• • Compliance with regional data sovereignty laws (e.g., EU’s DORA, UAE’s CBUAE Cloud Guidelines)

 

 

2. Real-Time Processing Standards

 

The Reserve Bank of India’s 2024 Core Banking Guidelines now enforce:

 

 

“End-to-end payment processing latency under 50ms for 99.99% of transactions”

 

 

Evaluation criteria typically assess:

 

• • Batch processing elimination

 

• • ISO 20022 message compatibility

 

• • Concurrent user capacity (minimum 10,000 TPS in RFPs from Tier 1 banks)

 

 

Emerging Evaluation Frameworks

 

Banks are adopting weighted scoring models favoring business agility over pure cost savings:

 

 

Criteria	Weight (2024 Avg.)	Vendor Assessment Method
API-first design	25%	Sandbox testing with bank’s OpenAPI specs
ESG alignment	15%	Carbon footprint reporting & DEI commitments
Legacy decommissioning	20%	Reference checks on prior migrations
Total cost of ownership	10%	7-year ROI modeling

 

Example: National Australia Bank’s 2024 RFP deducted 30% of scoring points from vendors lacking proven AI-powered reconciliation tools.

 

Best Practices for Vendors

 

1. 1. Template Customization:

       

      • • Use the bank’s RFP numbering schema in responses (e.g., “3.2.1 Response” for requirement 3.2.1)

       

      • • Embed compliance matrices with visual indicators (✓/×) for mandatory vs. optional features

       

       

 

1. 1. Proof Stack:

       

      • • Include architectural runbooks from past deployments (redacted)

       

      • • Provide third-party benchmarks (e.g., Gartner Critical Capabilities reports)

       

       

 

 

Procurement Team Recommendations

 

• • Pre-RFP Vendor Labs: Like HSBC’s “Project Nylon”, run 2-week sandbox trials before issuing RFPs

 

• • Anti-Lock-in Clauses: Mandate Kubernetes compatibility and escrow agreements for source code

 

 

Conclusion

 

The 2024 core banking RFP landscape demands vendors bridge regulatory hardening (Basel III, FRTB) with innovation delivery (GenAI copilots, quantum-resistant encryption). Winning submissions will align technical responses with business outcomes—for example, linking microservices architecture to reduced Time-to-Market for new products.

 

Resource: European Central Bank’s Core Banking Procurement Guidelines offers sample evaluation scorecards.

FintechRFPs.com offers a curated library of professionally written RFP and RFI templates tailored for the fintech, banking, and payments industries. Whether you’re preparing responses for compliance, API integrations, cybersecurity, or core banking solutions, our templates help you save time, reduce errors, and improve your win rate with procurement teams and institutional buyers.

Respond Smarter and Faster with FintechRFPs.com Templates

Take the next step: explore our growing collection of fintech-specific RFP templates and boost your bid quality—visit FintechRFPs.com today.

 

In the competitive fintech industry, crafting compelling proposals in response to RFPs (Requests for Proposal) can make or break a vendor’s chances of securing lucrative banking or credit union contracts. With procurement teams increasingly relying on structured scoring models, fintech sales teams must master the art of persuasive, compliant, and differentiated proposal writing. This article explores best practices for fintech proposal development, drawing from real-world RFP examples and industry insights.

 

Why Proposal Writing Matters in Fintech RFPs

 

Financial institutions use RFPs to standardize vendor evaluations, ensuring compliance, risk mitigation, and cost efficiency. A well-written proposal demonstrates technical expertise, aligns with procurement scoring criteria, and differentiates from competitors. For example, a 2023 Bank of Canada RFP for payment processing solutions required vendors to address 32 specific technical and operational requirements—missing even one could result in disqualification. Similarly, credit unions like Vancity’s SaaS procurement RFPs assign weighted scores to sections like security (30%), scalability (20%), and pricing (15%).

 

Key Components of a Winning Fintech Proposal

 

High-scoring proposals follow a structured approach, integrating:

 

1. 1. Executive Summary – A concise overview highlighting differentiators (e.g., “Our AI-powered fraud detection reduces false positives by 40%, as validated by XYZ Bank’s 2022 case study”).

 

1. 1. Compliance Matrix – A cross-referenced table matching RFP requirements to your solution’s capabilities. The European Central Bank’s open banking RFP templates explicitly require this format.

 

1. 1. Technical Depth – Detailed architecture diagrams, API documentation, or SOC 2 audit reports, as seen in Citibank’s 2023 RFP for cloud core banking solutions.

 

1. 1. Commercial Clarity – Transparent pricing models, including optional add-ons (e.g., FDIC-insured SaaS pricing tiers in a recent U.S. regional bank RFP).

 

 

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

 

Procurement teams frequently cite these vendor mistakes:

 

• • Overuse of Jargon: A UK fintech RFP response was downgraded for using undefined acronyms (e.g., “DLT” without explaining distributed ledger technology).

 

• • Generic Content: Recycled boilerplate text lacking institutional context (e.g., failing to address a credit union’s member-centric priorities).

 

• • Missed Deadlines: Late submissions, even by minutes, lead to automatic rejection, as per the strict rules in Canadian procurement portals like MERX.

 

 

Actionable Advice for Vendors and Procurement Teams

 

For Fintech Sales Teams:

 

• • Use RFP parsing tools (e.g., Loopio) to track requirement compliance.

 

• • Inject client-specific differentiators, such as referencing the bank’s public ESG goals when proposing green lending solutions.

 

• • Include multimedia (e.g., short demo videos) where allowed—a tactic that boosted a neobank’s proposal score by 15% in a 2023 EU tender.

 

 

For Procurement Professionals:

 

• • Provide clear scoring rubrics upfront (e.g., like the Reserve Bank of Australia’s fintech innovation RFPs).

 

• • Allow vendor questions during the bidding period to reduce clarifications post-submission.

 

• • Pilot AI-powered tools to automate initial compliance checks, as done by HSBC in 2024.

 

 

Future Trends in Fintech Proposal Strategies

 

Emerging trends include AI-driven response generation (e.g., ChatGPT for drafting baseline content) and dynamic pricing models embedded in proposals. Meanwhile, regulators like the FDIC are pushing for standardized ESG disclosures in financial services RFPs—a requirement vendors must preemptively address.

 

Conclusion

 

Fintech proposals are equal parts art and science. Winning requires meticulous attention to RFP criteria, a client-centric narrative, and flawless execution. By adopting these best practices, vendors can elevate their win rates, while procurement teams gain more actionable, comparable submissions—streamlining the path to digital transformation.

 

For public RFP examples, explore:

 

• • Bank of Canada RFP Archive

 

• • EU Tenders Electronic Daily

 

• • U.S. SAM.gov Fintech RFPs

 

FintechRFPs.com offers a curated library of professionally written RFP and RFI templates tailored for the fintech, banking, and payments industries. Whether you’re preparing responses for compliance, API integrations, cybersecurity, or core banking solutions, our templates help you save time, reduce errors, and improve your win rate with procurement teams and institutional buyers.

Respond Smarter and Faster with FintechRFPs.com Templates

Take the next step: explore our growing collection of fintech-specific RFP templates and boost your bid quality—visit FintechRFPs.com today.

 

Introduction

 

Cybersecurity has become a non-negotiable priority in financial services procurement, with banks and credit unions mandating stringent vendor security assessments in RFPs. A 2023 report by PYMNTS and BNY Mellon found that 92% of financial institutions now require third-party vendors to meet SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 certifications before contract awards. This reflects heightened regulatory scrutiny from the FFIEC, EBA, and other global bodies enforcing cybersecurity frameworks like NIST CSF.

 

Current Cybersecurity Demands in Banking RFPs

 

1. Regulatory-Driven Security Clauses

 

Recent RFPs from institutions like JPMorgan Chase and ING explicitly reference compliance with:

 

• • FFIEC CAT (Cybersecurity Assessment Tool)

 

• • DORA (EU Digital Operational Resilience Act)

 

• • NYDFS Part 500 (for U.S. institutions)

 

 

Example from a 2023 Credit Union RFP (Alliant Credit Union):

 

 

“Vendors must provide full audit logs of system access controls, penetration test results from the last 12 months, and documented incident response plans aligned with NIST SP 800-61.”

 

 

2. Technical Requirements

 

Procurement teams now scrutinize:

 

• • Zero-trust architecture implementation

 

• • Data encryption standards (AES-256 or higher)

 

• • Third-party risk management (e.g., vendor security scores via platforms like SecurityScorecard)

 

 

Trend Insight: The Bank of England’s 2024 fintech RFP mandated real-time threat intelligence feeds integrated with existing SIEM systems, signaling a shift toward proactive monitoring.

 

Vendor Response Strategies

 

✅ Must-Have Documentation

 

Fintechs should prepare:

 

1. 1. Certification decks: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, or PCI DSS attestations

 

1. 1. Questionnaire responses: Standardized formats like CAIQ (Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire) from Cloud Security Alliance

 

1. 1. Architecture diagrams: Highlighting encryption, data flows, and access controls

 

 

❌ Common Pitfalls to Avoid

 

• • Generic responses (e.g., “We follow best practices” without evidence)

 

• • Overlooking subprocessor risks (e.g., AWS/GCP compliance alone isn’t sufficient)

 

 

Best Practices for Procurement Teams

 

1. 1. Weighted Scoring: Allocate 30–40% of RFP evaluation points to cybersecurity (sample scoring template below):

 

 

 

Criteria	Weight	Vendor A	Vendor B
Certifications	20%	95	70
Pen Test Results	15%	85	90
Incident Response Time	10%	80	60

 

2. 2. Live Assessments: Conduct tabletop exercises during vendor shortlisting to test breach response protocols.

 

 

Future Trends & Takeaways

 

• • AI-Powered Vendor Screening: Tools like BitSight and Black Kite are being integrated into RFP processes for automated risk scoring.

 

• • ESG-Aligned Security: RFPs now link cybersecurity to broader ESG goals (e.g., BNP Paribas’ 2024 requirement for carbon-neutral data centers).

 

 

Actionable Tip: Vendors should monitor EU Tenders (TED) and SAM.gov for RFP language trends. A recent ECB tender emphasized quantum-resistant cryptography requirements—a growing differentiator.

 

For procurement teams, aligning cybersecurity demands with FFIEC CAT maturity tiers ensures consistency, while vendors must pre-package security evidence to accelerate evaluations. The gap between compliance and demonstrable resilience will define competitive advantage in 2024’s fintech RFPs.

 

References:

 

• • Sample Bank RFP Security Annex (FFIEC)

 

• • EU DORA Compliance Guidelines

 

FintechRFPs.com offers a curated library of professionally written RFP and RFI templates tailored for the fintech, banking, and payments industries. Whether you’re preparing responses for compliance, API integrations, cybersecurity, or core banking solutions, our templates help you save time, reduce errors, and improve your win rate with procurement teams and institutional buyers.

Respond Smarter and Faster with FintechRFPs.com Templates

Take the next step: explore our growing collection of fintech-specific RFP templates and boost your bid quality—visit FintechRFPs.com today.

 

Modernizing core banking systems is one of the highest-stakes procurement processes for financial institutions. A well-structured Request for Proposal (RFP) ensures banks and credit unions select vendors capable of delivering scalable, secure, and regulatory-compliant solutions. This article breaks down the most frequent requirements and evaluation criteria in core banking RFPs, with actionable insights for vendors and procurement teams.

 

The Growing Demand for Core Banking Modernization

 

Banks face mounting pressure to replace legacy systems with agile, cloud-based platforms to support real-time payments, open banking APIs, and AI-driven analytics. According to a 2023 Deloitte report, 62% of financial institutions prioritize core system replacements within five years. RFPs for these projects often demand:

 

• • End-to-end transaction processing (deposits, loans, payments)

 

• • Scalability for multi-country or multi-currency operations

 

• • Regulatory compliance (e.g., GDPR, PSD2, Basel III)

 

 

For example, a 2022 RFP by a European bank (publicly available on TED – EU Tenders) included detailed technical requirements for ISO 20022 payment messaging and fraud detection integration.

 

Key RFP Requirements: Technical and Operational

 

1. Functional Requirements

 

Most RFPs list core capabilities like:

 

• • Account lifecycle management (opening, servicing, closures)

 

• • APIs for third-party integrations (e.g., fintech partners)

 

• • Real-time transaction processing

 

 

A Midwestern U.S. credit union’s 2023 RFP (sample template here) mandated “24/7 uptime with ≤15 minutes/month downtime” and “built-in tools for Member Business Loan underwriting.”

 

2. Security and Compliance

 

Cybersecurity requirements dominate vendor evaluations:

 

• • SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 certifications

 

• • Data encryption (at rest and in transit)

 

• • Audit trails for all user actions

 

 

For instance, a Canadian bank’s RFP (found on MERX) required vendors to document past incidents of breaches and resolution timelines.

 

3. Vendor Viability and Support

 

Procurement teams assess:

 

• • Implementation timelines (average 12–18 months for core migrations)

 

• • Customer references (live deployments with comparable institutions)

 

• • Pricing models (e.g., SaaS subscription vs. perpetual license)

 

 

Evaluation Criteria: How Banks Score Proposals

 

Financial institutions typically use weighted scoring models (70% technical, 30% commercial). A top-10 U.S. bank’s RFP scoring sheet allocated points as follows:

 

 

Category	Weight
Functional fit	25%
Security/compliance	20%
Total cost of ownership	15%
Vendor reputation	10%
Implementation roadmap	10%
Customer support SLAs	10%
ESG alignment	10%

 

Best Practices for Vendors and Procurement Teams

 

For Vendors Responding to RFPs:

 

• • Prioritize compliance: Pre-emptively answer security questions with certifications and audit reports.

 

• • Customize templates: Align proposal language with the RFP’s scoring criteria (e.g., highlight “scalability” if weighted highly).

 

• • Provide benchmarks: Reference live deployments (e.g., “Reduced fraud incidents by 30% at Bank X”).

 

 

For Procurement Teams:

 

• • Standardize requirements: Use templates like the NAFCU Core RFP Checklist.

 

• • Include SMEs in scoring: Involve IT, risk, and operations teams in evaluations.

 

• • Clarify timeline expectations: 60% of vendor delays stem from unclear requirements.

 

 

Future Trends in Core Banking RFPs

 

Expect AI-driven procurement tools to automate RFP evaluations by 2025, alongside stricter ESG disclosures (e.g., carbon footprint of cloud hosting). Vendors must also prepare for modular RFPs, where banks seek standalone components (e.g., payments engines) instead of monolithic systems.

 

Key Takeaway: A rigorous RFP process minimizes risk in core banking projects. Vendors should treat proposals as competitive differentiators, while banks must balance innovation with due diligence.

 

For further reading, explore the Central Bank of Kenya’s 2023 Core Banking RFP, which includes a detailed vendor responsiveness matrix.

FintechRFPs.com offers a curated library of professionally written RFP and RFI templates tailored for the fintech, banking, and payments industries. Whether you’re preparing responses for compliance, API integrations, cybersecurity, or core banking solutions, our templates help you save time, reduce errors, and improve your win rate with procurement teams and institutional buyers.

Respond Smarter and Faster with FintechRFPs.com Templates

Take the next step: explore our growing collection of fintech-specific RFP templates and boost your bid quality—visit FintechRFPs.com today.